Pool size is a vanity metric. If a provider claims 72 million IPs but 30% of them are pre-flagged by Amazon before you even send your first request, you aren't paying for a massive pool — you're paying to rotate through garbage. I spent the last month running identical workloads across the four major providers to find out what you actually get for your money in 2026.
The most important finding: when you factor in block rates and bandwidth expiry, the "cheapest" $/GB on paper is often the most expensive in production.
The 2026 Benchmark
I tested each provider with 100 concurrent requests sustained for one hour against Amazon and various retail targets. These are measured results, not marketing claims.
| Provider | Avg latency | Amazon block rate | Sticky session | Bandwidth expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProxyLabs (Private) | 200ms | 4% | 30 min | None |
| Smartproxy (Shared) | 300ms | 15% | 30 min | 30 days |
| Bright Data (Shared) | 300–500ms | 18% | 30 min | 30 days |
| Oxylabs (Shared) | 400ms+ | 12% | 10 min | 30 days |
Effective Cost: The Math That Changes the Decision
Advertised prices are deceptive. If you pay $3.00/GB but only 82% of requests succeed, your real cost per successful GB is $3.65. With shared pools where IPs arrive pre-flagged, you waste even more on retries.
Then there's the expiry tax. Most providers expire unused bandwidth after 30 days. If you buy a 100GB plan but use 70GB, your real per-GB cost is not the advertised price:
| Provider | Advertised price | Usage | Real cost per GB used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProxyLabs | £2.50 (~$3.15) | 70GB of 100GB | $3.15 (no expiry) |
| Smartproxy | $4.00 | 70GB of 100GB | $5.71 |
| Bright Data | $5.04 | 70GB of 100GB | $7.20 |
| Oxylabs | $8.00 | 70GB of 100GB | $11.43 |
And that's before accounting for the block rate. The full picture — effective cost per successful GB, assuming you use 70GB of your plan:
| Provider | Effective price/GB | Block rate | Cost per successful GB |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProxyLabs | $3.15 | 4% | $3.28 |
| Smartproxy | $5.71 | 15% | $6.72 |
| Bright Data | $7.20 | 18% | $8.78 |
| Oxylabs | $11.43 | 12% | $12.99 |
ProxyLabs isn't just cheaper upfront — it's cheaper per successful request at any realistic usage level.
Latency Under Load
Latency isn't just about speed. It signals pool stability. During my 100-concurrency test, Bright Data's response times spiked to 500ms+ during peak rotation. ProxyLabs' private pool held a tight ~200ms spread because those IPs aren't being hammered by five other customers simultaneously.
The latency gap matters most for time-sensitive operations. At 200ms vs 400ms, you're twice as likely to beat other automation at ticket drops, limited releases, and any flow with a race condition.
Sticky Sessions and Ticketing
Oxylabs caps sticky sessions at 10 minutes. Major event queues on Ticketmaster routinely run 20–35 minutes. If your IP rotates while you're at position #800 in the queue, your Queue-it token is invalidated and you restart at the back. A 10-minute sticky limit has a ~90% failure rate on high-demand ticket drops — not because of detection, but because of math.
ProxyLabs, Smartproxy, and Bright Data all support 30-minute sessions. For any stateful workflow longer than 10 minutes, Oxylabs is structurally broken.
Provider Summary
ProxyLabs at £2.50/GB with private pools is the clear cost-performance winner for most use cases — ticketing, scraping, account management. The private pool means no inherited IP reputation from other customers.
Bright Data makes sense at enterprise scale where you need managed tooling (Web Unlocker, Scraping Browser), dedicated support, and contractual SLAs. The cost premium is real; so is the enterprise infrastructure.
Smartproxy is a reasonable middle option if you need a larger shared pool and can't justify Bright Data pricing. Expect shared-pool contamination.
Oxylabs is for compliance-heavy enterprise use cases — banks, hedge funds, SOC 2 requirements. Not for performance.
Ready to try the fastest residential proxies?
Join developers and businesses who trust ProxyLabs for mission-critical proxy infrastructure.
Building proxy infrastructure since 2019. Previously failed at many things, now failing slightly less.
Related Articles
Free vs Paid Proxies: A Brutally Honest Comparison
We tested free proxy lists, free tiers from paid providers, and paid residential proxies against the same 50 targets. Here's the actual data on speed, reliability, detection rates, and what free proxies are genuinely useful for.
9 min readResidential vs Datacenter Proxies: Full Comparison
Residential vs datacenter proxies — the decision that determines whether your requests go through or get blocked. Real block rate data, cost analysis, and exactly when each type makes sense.
10 min readContinue exploring
Implementation guides for requests, Scrapy, Axios, Puppeteer, and more.
See how residential proxies fit large-scale scraping workflows.
Evaluate ProxyLabs against Bright Data, Oxylabs, Smartproxy, and others.
Browse location coverage and targeting options across 195+ countries.